![]() They are, and how we can start being more honest about how we manage these risks. Let’s take a look at some of Mudge’s accusations and ask ourselves how common So while this news might be horrifying, it is not shocking. Policies are playing out in companies every day, especially when guarding against Twitter’s struggles to enforce its own security Twitter’s security issues might be particularly dramatic and dangerous, they’reĪlso frighteningly commonplace. Meanwhile, people familiar with enterprise cybersecurity know that while Losing all the followers they spent years cultivating.) Has no meaningful competitors, and jumping ship means (Technically, they could leave Twitter, but the platform Mishandled by tech companies, and while it might be infuriating, there’s nothing General public has weathered years of stories about their personal data being Like a five-alarm fire: it’s because we don’t expect anything better. (And that “yawn” reaction is, of course, exactly why automatic updates are soīut there’s a deeper reason why no one is treating Twitter’s security failures But that fact won’t hit nearly as hard if you’re a user who’sĪccustomed to clicking “remind me later” every time there’s an OS update. Software and security updates is (or should be) horrifying to cybersecurity Mudge’sĪllegation that over 30% of Twitter’s employee devices disabled automatic The most obvious answer is that it’s tough for journalists to write aboutĬybersecurity in ways that resonate with non-technical readers. Given the amount of sensitive data the site has on its users–including andĮspecially journalists–and the fact that its security lapses have alreadyĬaused global chaos, why aren’t we all more alarmed? Why It’s Hard To Talk About the Twitter Security Story Still, it’s worth asking why the economic story is overshadowing the security one. Notoriously polarizing World’s Richest Man and a scandal-plagued social media Of candor about it–is the basis of Elon Musk’s claim that he should beĪllowed to walk away from his acquisition deal. That’s unsurprising, since Twitter’s bot issue–and the company’s lack Lack of Leadership: When Twitter’s leadership was confronted with theĪbove problems, they were apathetic, ineffectual, or dishonest.įrom there, the story got even narrower as coverage began to focus on issues twoĪnd three.Spam and Bots: Twitter failed to provide its employees with meaningful.Shortcomings, which it failed to address even in response to an FTC settlement Shoddy Security: Twitter suffered from “extreme, egregious” security.To begin, the 84 pages of Zatko’s redacted complaint were quickly divided into three Happen, those journalists tried to distill a complex story into its simplest and His ex-employers, it sparked a journalistic feeding frenzy. When Twitter’s former head of security, Peter “Mudge” Zatko, blew the whistle on
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |